The India Envelopes Limited v. Vijay Cotton And Fiber Co
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26.11.2021 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice PARESH UPADHYAY and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP O.S.A.No.220 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.9236 of 2021 The India Envelope Limited rep. By its Managing Director B.Ramachandran ...Appellant Vs 1.Vijay Cotton & Fiber Co., a Registered Partnership Firm Having Office at S-25 & S-27, Cotton Green (East), Mumbai - 400 033.
2.Vijay Cotton & Fiber LLP, Limited Liability Partnership, Having Office at S-25 & S-27, Cotton Green (East), Mumbai - 400 033.
3.Satyam Agro Industries, Proprietary Concern having its place of business at Main Road, Ozhar, District Barwani - 451 449.
4.Sundaram Industries, Proprietary Concern having its place of business at 3, Pratapganj, Sendhwa - 451 666.
5.Shivam Cot Fibers Pvt. Ltd., A Private Limited Company having its Office at Maulana Azad Marg, Sendhwa - 451 666.
6.Satyam Cotex Pvt. Ltd., A Private Limited Company having its Office at Maulana Azad Marg, Sendhwa - 451 666.
7.Shivam Cotton Corporation, A Private Limited Company having its Office at Maulana Azad Marg, Sendhwa - 451 666.
8.Natraj Cotton Pvt. Ltd., 383, AT Post, Tasma, Tq, Hadgon - 431 713, Maharashtra.
9.Satyam Fibers, Proprietary Concern having its place of business at Main Road, Ozhar, District Barwani - 451 449. ...Respondents Appeal preferred under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of O.S. Rules r/w Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 22.02.2021 made in O.P.No.250 of 2020.
Prayer in O.P.No.250 of 2020:
Petition filed under Section 11(6)A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, to constitute single Member Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate/resolve the disputes between parties in accordance with provisions of Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act .
For Appellant ..
Mr.R.Murali For Respondents..
Mr.N.P.Vijayakumar
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) Challenge in this appeal is made to the order passed by learned Single Judge dated 22 February 2021 on O.P.No.250 of 2020.
2. Learned advocate for the appellant states that, according to him, the appellant has not approached the right forum with his grievance against the order of learned single Judge. He therefore seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. 3.Permission as prayed for is granted. This Original Side Appeal is disposed of accordingly. It is noted that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR mmi/16 To The Sub Assistant Registrar, Original Side, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to M/s.R.Murali, Advocate Sr.61677 O.S.A.No.220 of 2021 bp[co] srg 20/12/2021