Ruth Joyce v. State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixth day of May Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.10517 of 2022 RUTH JOYCE [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADIPAKKAM, CHENNAI.

(CRIME NO.5/2015) For Petitioner : M/S. K.BALASUBRAMANIAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 498(A), 406, 323, 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.05 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that, already this Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.25120 of 2018. However, the petitioner not complied the order of this Court in Crl.O.P.NO.25120 of 2018 dated 01.11.2018.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that after the grant of second anticipatory bail, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 06/05/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADIPAKKAM, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. K.BALASUBRAMANIAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10517/2022 Date :06/05/2022 RW 13/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/