Madras High CourtWP/12603/2026disposed of

R.Mogana v. The District Collector

2026-04-09Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE R.Mogana ..Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The District Collector office of the district collector, District Collectorate, Kallakurichi District.

2. The Reveneu Divisional officer office of the Revenue divisional officer, Katchery road, Kallakurichi District.

3. The Tashildhar Taluk office, Sankarapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

4. The Surveyor Taluk office Sankarapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

5. The Superintendent of police o/o.The Superintendent of police, Thachur road, Kallakurichi District.

6. The Deputy Superintendent of police, o/o.The Deputy Superintendent of police, Santhapet, Thirukovilur, Kallakurichi District.

7. The Inspector of police, Sanakarapuram Police Station, Sankarapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District.

..Respondent(s)

directing the 1st to 4th respondents to survey and fix the boundaries of the petitioners property situated at Arasampattu Village, Sankarapuram Taluk, Kallakurichi District, comprised in survey No.53/6B1B measuring an extent of 2.00 ares and survey No.53/9B measuring an extent of 0.36.0 ares, within a time frame to be fixed by this Honble court and consequently direct the 5th to 7th respondents to provide adequate police protection at the time of conducting the survey.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.S.J.Raja Janakiraman For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For R1 to R4 Mr.V.Meganathan Govt.Advocate (crl.side) For R5 to R7 Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to respondents 1 to 4 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by her, based on her representation dated 02.09.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner had submitted her representation dated 02.09.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3.Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 to 4. Mr.V.Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of respondents 5 to 7.

4.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

5.No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the said authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom the respondents deem it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- (a) Before surveying the lands in question, the third respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the fourth respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs.

09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VGA