V.Kathiresan v. The State Of Tamilnadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 05.10.2017 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Writ Petition No.35161 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 1 V.Kathiresan 2 R.Rajagopal 3 D.Ravikumar 4 E.Delhi Babu 5 N.Karthikeyan 6 R.Babu 7 N.Rajasekaran 8 B.Elumalai 9 D.Ashok Kumar 10 M.M. Chellapandian 11 V.S.Rajasekaran 12 N.Gowrisankar 13 S.Teekaraman 14 B.Parthiban 15 K.Manokaran 16 S.Murugan 17 K.D. Sivakumar 18 D.Nakkeeran 19 M.Gajendran 20 K.Rajakannu 21 M.Sivasankaran 22 M.Ashok Kumar 23 S.Perumal 24 Tmt.B.Charumathi 25 C.V.Sasikala 26 A.Gengadaran 27 L.Pandurangan 28 R. Sivakumar 29 M.Ravi 30 S.Ramesh Babu 31 R.Anbuselvan 32 K.Gandhi 33 V.Panchatcharam 34 N.Venkatesan 35 V.Boopalan 36 S.Anandhan 37 D.Rajasundar Salamon 38 S.Vinayagam
39 S.Ravichandran 40 G.Suganthi 41 S.Latha 42 M.P.Lakshmi 43 R.Kalaiarasan 44 G.Vinayagam 45 A.Subramani 46 N.Dhanasekar 47 K.Pandiyan 48 S.Venkatesan 49 A.Nithyanandam 50 K.Ravichandran 51 P.Mahendrababu 52 G.Nithyavelan 53 G.Rajan 54 S.R.Sudharsan 55 S.Rajamanickam 56 M.Balasubramanian 57 K.Dhanapal 58 P.Senthil Kumar 59 A.Jesuraj 60 O.Kumaran 61 R.Kumar 62 K.Thirupathi 63 T.Krishnamurthy 64 T.Anbalagan 65 R.Arivalagan 66 V.Venugopal 67 G.Kalaimani 68 L.Ramamoorthy 69 B.Sethuraman 70 S.Pazhanivel 71 A.Nagarajan 72 K.Srinivasan
...Petitioners
Vs 1 The State of Tamilnadu Rep by the Secretary to Govt. Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department Secretariat Chennai 9 2 The Secretary to Govt.
Finance Department Secretariat Chennai 9 3 The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner for Revenue Administration Ezhilagam Chepauk Chennai 5
4 The Director of School Education College Road Chennai 6 5 The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Chepauk Chennai 5 6 The Commissioner/Director of Treasuries and Accounts Saidapet Chennai 15
...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays to directing the respondents to count the service of the petitioners atleast with effect from the date of Honourable Supreme Court order reported in AIR 1999 SC 3825 Govt. of Tamilnadu Vs G. Mohammed Ammenudeen dt 28.9.1999 or the order of Govt. of Tamilnadu in G.O.Ms.No.30 P & AR Dept. dt 16.2.2000 and G.O.Ms.No.209 P & AR Dept. dt 23.11.2001 atleast for the purpose of pensionary benefits under the old pension scheme in pursuance of the Tamilnadu Pension Rules and consequently pass all the retirement benefits on the retirement of the petitioners.
For Petitioners : Mr.R.Singaravelan (SC) for Ms.M.Srividhya For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar, AGP
O R D E R
The relief sought for in this writ petition is for a direction to direct the respondents to count the service of the petitioners atleast with effect from the date of Honourable Supreme Court order reported in AIR 1999 SC 3825 Govt. of Tamilnadu Vs G. Mohammed Ammenudeen dt 28.9.1999 or the order of Govt. of Tamilnadu in G.O.Ms.No.30 P & AR Dept. dt 16.2.2000 and G.O.Ms.No.209 P & AR Dept. dt 23.11.2001 atleast for the purpose of pensionary benefits under the old pension scheme in pursuance of the Tamilnadu Pension Rules and consequently pass all the retirement benefits on the retirement of the petitioners.
2. The learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioners contended that though the relief was granted to the writ petitioners for permanent absorption only in the year 2004, due to the delay on the part of the authorities in implementing the order of the Hon'ble Apex Court, dated 28.09.1999, the service benefits are denied. Because of the
delay, the petitioners should not be deprived for old pension under the Tamilnadu Pension Rules. In this regard they have submitted representations citing all these factual circumstances to the respondents and no final decision is taken by the respondents in this regard.
3. Thus without going into the merits and demerits of the matter, the first respondent is directed to consider the representations submitted by the writ petitioners on 14.08.2014 and 29.12.2014, by taking note of the Judgment and the Government orders and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Writ petitioners are directed to enclose a copy of the representations along with all other relevant documents and copy of the order passed in this writ petition.
No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rna To
1. The State of Tamilnadu Rep by the Secretary to Govt. Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department Secretariat Chennai 9
2. The Secretary to Govt.
Finance Department Secretariat Chennai 9
3. The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner for Revenue Administration Ezhilagam Chepauk Chennai 5
4. The Director of School Education College Road Chennai 6
5. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Chepauk Chennai 5
6. The Commissioner/Director of Treasuries and Accounts Saidapet Chennai 15 +1cc to Ms.M.Srividhya, Advocate, S.R.No.71546 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.73416 W.P.No.35161 of 2014 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 CS/01/11/17