Parthasarathy v. The State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :09.06.2022 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Crl.R.C.No.650 of 2022 and Crl.MP.No.6847 of 2022 1.Parthasarathy 2.Tamilselvi 3.Sakunathala ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Paparapatti Police Station, Dharmapurit District.

... Respondent (in Crime No.178 of 2018) Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C, to call for the records culminating in Cr.M.P.No.607 of 2021 in S.C.No.81 of 2019, dismissed by the Learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, in order dated 17.03.2022, allow the same.

For Petitioner :

No Appearance For Respondent :

Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Adovocate (crl.side)

O R D E R

This revision is filed against the dismissal of the discharge application filed by the accused No.1 to 3, who are the petitioners in this case.

2.The first petitioner is the husband and the second petitioner is the mother-in-law and the third petitioner is the sister-in-law of the deceased/Vennila.

3.There was no representation of the counsel for the petitioner on the last occasion and today also when the matter was called, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

morning, thereafter, it was passed over. However, again when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. In such circumstances, the case was taken up for disposal.

4.Heard Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent and perused the material records of the case.

5.It is seen that the application for discharge has been dismissed by the Trial Court by taking into account the incriminating materials filed along with the final report and list of witnesses and their statements under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., which implicates all the petitioners. Therefore, when there are prima facie materials, to proceed against the petitioners under Section 498A and Section 306 of IPC, the Trial Court has rightly dismissed the discharge application and this revision is filed without any merits and as such, the Criminal Revision is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar klt To

1. The Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri .

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Crl.R.C.No.650 of 2022 AJB(CO) UMA(17/06/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/