Kesavan v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of May Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.10575 of 2022 KESAVAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PROHIBITION ENFORCEMENT WING, NANNILAM, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.144 OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S.T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1)(aaa) and 4(1) TNP Act in Crime No.144 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that when the respondent police was on their routine ride, they found that the petitioner was in possession of 110 litres of Pondy Arrack.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner stating that the petitioner is a History Sheeter.

4. Considering the opposition made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 05/05/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PROHIBITION ENFORCEMENT WING, NANNILAM, THIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.T.MURUGANANTHAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10575/2022 Date :05/05/2022 TA-17/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/