← Library
Madras High CourtWP/10604/2020dismissed as infructuous

S.Ganesan v. The Chairman

2022-11-02Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian,Honourable Mr Justice K.Kumaresh Babu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and W.M.P.No.12884 of 2020 S.Ganesan

...Petitioner in WP.No.10604/2020

K.Ramu

...Petitioner in WP.No.10612/2020

Vs.

1.The Chairman, Chennai Port Trust, No.1, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 1.

2.The Secretary, Chennai Port Trust, No.1, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 1.

3.The Chief Mechanical Engineer, Mechanical, Electrical and Electronics Department, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai.

...Respondents in both the WPs

Prayer in W.P.Nos.10604 of 2020 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 3rd respondent in it 1/4

No.CME/B1/1517/2019/MEE dated 30.04.2020 and quash the same consequently direct the respondents to sanction Full Pension including commutation, gratuity, leave salary and other terminal benefits along with interest at 12% per annum without waiting for verification of the community certificate before the State Level Scrutiny Committee. Prayer in W.P.Nos.10612 of 2020 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction Full Pension including commutation, gratuity, leave salary and other terminal benefits along with interest at 12% per annum without waiting for verification of the community certificate before the State Level Scrutiny Committee.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vijayashankar in both WPs For Respondents : Mr.R.Karthikeyan, Standing Counsel in both WPs ******* C O M M O N O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) Mr.V.Vijayashankar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in the above writ petitions would submit that the Port Trust had sanctioned the pension of the petitioners. Hence, nothing survives in these writ petitions.

2/4

2. In view of the same, these writ petitions are disposed of as having become infrucutous. No costs. Consequently, the connected writ miscellaneous petition is closed.

(R.S.M.,J.) (K.B.,J.) 02.11.2022 dsa Index :No Internet :Yes Non-Speaking order To:- 1.The Chairman, Chennai Port Trust, No.1, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 1.

2.The Secretary, Chennai Port Trust, No.1, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 1.

3.The Chief Mechanical Engineer, Mechanical, Electrical and Electronics Department, Chennai Port Trust, Chennai.

3/4

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and K.KUMARESH BABU, J.

dsa 02.11.2022 4/4