A.George v. The Commissioner Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.07.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI A.George ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.
2. The Inspector of Police (Crimes), G-5 Secretariat Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.
... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to set aside the order dated 20.03.2024 made in Crl.M.P.No.11509 of 2024 on the file of the II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and direct the learned Magistrate to take the complaint on file.
For Petitioner :
Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondents :
Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
This criminal revision has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 20.03.2024 passed by the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, in Crl.M.P.No.11509 of 2024.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner's daughter had written Railway Recruitment Board Exams on several times and in spite of her best efforts, she could not get the job. At that time, the petitioner approached one Saminathan regarding the job for his daughter in the Railways and for which, the said Saminathan introduced the petitioner / complainant to one Micheal and Thayalani Devi who are working in the Railways Recruitment Board Office. They told the petitioner that if the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.12 Lakhs, they will get the job under the Minster Quota. Regarding the same, the petitioner has deposited a sum
of Rs.12 Lakhs to the accused persons. In spite of several requests and demands made by the petitioner, the accused persons neither secured the job nor returned the amount paid by him. Hence, the petitioner has filed a private complaint under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C. before the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai to register FIR against the accused persons. However the said petition was dismissed. Challenging the same, the present revision has been filed by the petitioner.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents submitted that during the pendency of the case, the matter was enquired and the case was registered against the accused persons in Crime No.145 of 2024 under Sections 406, 420, 465 and 471 of IPC and he has produced a copy of the same before this Court and hence nothing survives for adjudication in this revision.
4. In view of the above submission made by the learned
Government Advocate, as the Law Enforcing Agency has registered a case against the accused persons in Crime No.145 of 2024 under Sections 406, 420, 465 and 471 of IPC, this Court is of the view that, nothing survives for further adjudication in this revision.
5. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case stands dismissed. 08.07.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No vji
To
1. The learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007.
3. The Inspector of Police (Crimes), G-5 Secretariat Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010.
4. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
vji 08.07.2024