Madras High CourtWP/3035/2016dismissed as abated

K.Ramasamy v. The Director Of Municipality

2023-01-12Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.01.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR K.Ramasamy ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Director of Municipality, Commissioner and Special Commissioner for Administration, Ezhilagam, 5th Floor, Chepauk, Chennai.

2. The Regional Director of Municipal Administration, Salem Arisipalayam.

3. The Commissioner, Karur Municipality, Karur - 638 001.

4. The Commissioner, Tiruchengode Municipality, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

5. The Commissioner, Namakkal Municipality, Namakkal.

6. The Commissioner, Pallipalayam Municipality, Pallipalayam, Namakkal District, Erode - 638 006.

7. The Commissioner, 1/6

Hosur Municipality, Krishnagiri District.

8. The Commissioner, Dharmapuri Municipality, Dharmapuri District.

9. The Commissioner, Krishnagiri Municipality, Krishnagiri District.

10. The Commissioner, Namakkal Municipality, Namakkal District.

11. The Commissioner, Mettur Municipality, Salem District.

12. The Commissioner, Kumarapalayam Municipality, Namakkal District.

13. The Commissioner, Attur Municipality, Salem District.

14. The Commissioner, Adapadi Municipality, Salem District.

... Respondents Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed, under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to issue a plumber license.

For Petitioner : Ms.P.Pooja For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh, Government Advocate - R1 & 2 Mr.N.K.Ponraj - R3 2/6

Mr.P.Naveneetha Krishnan - R4 & R11 Mr.M.Rajamathivanan - R5 Mr.M.Balakrishnan - R6 Mr.N.Subbarayalu - R7 Mrs.R.Sri Jayanthi - R8 Mr.P.Srinivas - R12 Mr.R.P.Prathap Singh - R14 No appearance - R10

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to issue a plumber license to the petitioner.

2. When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that they had already sent a letter to their client, but they have not received any instructions from their client.

3. Whereas, the learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent submitted that the petitioner died on 29.03.2019 and he has also filed a copy of the death certificate of the petitioner. 3/6

4. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the fifth respondent, this Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. No costs. 12.01.2023 vrc To