Ramesh v. Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twelfth day of May Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. SIVAGNANAM CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.10992 of 2022 1 RAMESH [ PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED ] 2 LALITHA Vs STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VANIYAMBADI TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUPATHUR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S.S.SASIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SUGENDRAN,Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest upon the complaint given by the defacto complainant before the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity, the petitioners had abused the de-facto complainant in filthy language and also attacked with hands. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-police submitted that enquiry is pending in C.S.R. No. 479 of 2022 with the respondent-Police based on the complaint given by the de-facto complainant.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they had not committed any such offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that they had been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he pleads for anticipatory bail.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that now the complaint is pending at the C.S.R. stage, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi on condition that the petitioners shall execute own bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioners shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(c)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 12/05/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VANIYAMBADI,THIRUPATHUR DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VANIYAMBADI TALUK POLICE STATION, THIRUPATHUR DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1CC to M/S.S.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.7085 CRL OP.10992/2022 Date :12/05/2022 CSK 16/05/2022