Madras High CourtAS/296/2024disposed of in memo of compromise

N.Harirajan v. S.Ramesh Krishnan

2026-06-08Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar9 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR and CMP No. 9573 of 2024 N.Harirajan S/o.Late M.N.Nithiyanandam ..Appellant(s) Vs S.Ramesh Krishnan S/o.Late K.M.Sambasivam ..Respondent(s) Appeal Suit filed under Section 96 and 105(1) of CPC read with Order XLI Rule 1 of CPC to set aside the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.2899 of 2023 dated 21.02.2024 on the file of the XXI Additional City Civil Court, Alikulam, Chennai.

For Appellant(s):

Mr.S.Janarthanam for Mr.A.V.Arumugam For Respondent(s):

Mr.Balamurali of M/s.Shivakumar and Suresh (Law Firm) Judgment (Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan J.) The appellant N.Harirajan and the respondent Mr.S.Ramesh are present in Court. Both the learned counsel also present in Court. The appellant and the

respondent had entered into a Joint Compromise Memo dated 01.06.2026. The appeal arises from the suit for recovery of money, which had been decreed. Both the parties have entered into a compromise memo which is as follows:

2. The attention of the Sub-Registrar, Sowcarpet is drawn to Clause 2(G) (n) of Joint Compromise Memo relating to registration of Lease Deed.

3. The appeal stands disposed of in accordance with the above said Joint Compromise Memo. The above joint Compromise Memo shall form part of the decree. In view of the fact that the parties have settled the issue out of Court, the Court fees may be refunded to the appellant in accordance with the Rules. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

(C.V.K.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gpa

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J.

AND K.RAJASEKAR J.

gpa and CMP No. 9573 of 2024 08-06-2026