Raman, v. Arulmigu Vardaraja Perumal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.12.2017

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A. No.1044 of 2002 1.Raman 2.Kuppusamy ... Appellants Vs.

Arulmigu Varadaraja Perumal Koil Kalvadangam,represented by its Hereditory Trustee, R.Venkatachala Konar, Kalvadangam, Kaveripatti Agraharam, Sangagiri Taluk, Salem District.

... Respondent Prayer:

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Sangagiri in A.S.No.95 of 1998 dated 04.04.2001 preferred against the Judgment and Decree of the Learned District Munsif of Sangagiri in O.S.No.119 of 1993 dated 23.10.1998.

For Appellants :No appearance For Respondent :Mr.P.Palaniswamy

J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the respondent present. Learned counsel for the appellants had already reported no instructions and accordingly as the appellants remained absent on being called, Registry was directed to list the matter today (i.e) on 11.12.2017, under the caption "for dismissal", by printing the names of the appellants.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants. Appellants called absent. 2.Resultantly, the second appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution with costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mfa To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Sangagiri.

2. The District Munsif of Sangagiri.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A. No.398 of 2002 (CS-V) EU(03/01/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/