Kailash v. State By Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of May Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.10660 of 2022 KAILASH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE [ RESPONDENT ] KANNAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.78/2022.

For Petitioner : M/S.N.SUDHARSAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Government Advocate, (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 279 & 337 of IPC later altered into Section 279, 337, 273, 323 r/w 511 of IPC and Section 24(1) of COTP Act in Crime No.78 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that petitioner had earlier filed an anticipatory bail petition in Crl.O.P.No.5776 of 2022, which was dismissed. However, there is no reference about the dismissal of earlier anticipatory bail petition in this present petition and it https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

amounts to suppression of material facts. Therefore, without going into the merits of the petition, this Criminal original petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 05/05/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KANNAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.N.SUDHARSAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10660/2022 Date :05/05/2022 RW 13/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/