Ramesh v. The State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Crl.O.P.No.10071 of 2021

1. Ramesh, S/o. Samiyaya Devar

2. Mrs.Kalanithi, W/o. Ramesh ... Petitioners Vs.

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Cyber Crime Branch, S.P.Office Building, Tiruvarur District.

(Crime No.not known of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.not known of 2021, on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Kingston Jerold For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl.side)

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners apprehend arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 509 of I.P.C. read with Section 67 of Information Technology Act, 2000 and read with Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998, seek anticipatory bail.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent would submit that as on date, no complaint has been lodged by the defacto complainant as alleged by the petitioners.

3. Recording the submissions, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

-sd/- 11/06/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO

1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CYBER CRIME BRANCH, S.P.OFFICE BUILDING, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

2. THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT MADRAS 104.

CC to M/S.S.KINGSTON JEROLD Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10071/2021 Date :11/06/2021 SP(28/06/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/