R.Krishnan v. R.Shankar And 7 Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE A No. 2340 of 2026 in T.O.S. No. 31 of 2021 R.Krishnan S/o.Late Ram Chandran Natesan, No.8, Shiva Sai PG for Gents, 9th Cross, 1st Stage, HBR Layout, 4th Block, Kacharakanahalli, Bangalore-560 043 presently residing at:

NO.18-SS PG for gents, 9th cross, 1st stage, HBR Layout, 4th block, Hennur, Kalyananagar, Bengaluru - 560 043.

..Applicant(s) Vs

1. R.Shankar S/o.Ram Chandra Natesan, New No.12, Old No.26, IInd Street, East Abhiramapuram, Mylapore, Chennai-600

2. R.Narayanan S/o.Ram Chandra Natesan, New No.12, Old No.26, IInd Street, East Abhiramapuram, Mylapore, Chennai-600

3. Pratima W/o.Late Mr.Prem Natesan, 1/5

C/o.R.Dilip, No.336, 5th Main, 2nd Cross, Sadananda Nagar, NGEE Layout, Banglore-560 A.Krishnamurthy (died) Mrs.Vasanthi Kalyansundar (died)

4. Kalyansundar Address Flat No.5, Sri Sai Sarvesh Apartments, No.5, Avenue Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 034.

5. Archana Kalyansundar 1C, Sharanalaya Apartments, No.11, Prithvi Avenue, 2nd Street, Abhiramapuram, Chennai - 600 018.

6. Jyotsna Kalyansundar 711, 1st Street, apt 502, Hoboken, NJ 07030.

Raj.S (Deceased)

7. Nishant S/o.Late Raj, Old No.32, New No.46, Shree Varshini, Vijaya Raghava Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

8. Sneha D/o.Late Raj, 92, Monalisa Society, St.John Baptish Road, Bandra West, Mumbai - 400 050.

..Respondent(s) 2/5

To appoint an Advocate Commissioner to record the evidence of DW1, namely the Applicant, at his residence bearing No.18-SS PG for Gents, 9th Cross, 1st Stage, HBR Layout, 4th Block, Hennur, Kalyananagar Bengaluru 560 043, in view of his advanced age and medical condition. For Applicant(s):

Mr.S. Rajmakesh For Respondent(s):

Mr.P.Raman, Senior counsel.

ORDER

This application has been filed to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to record the evidence of DW1, namely the Applicant, at his residence bearing No.18SS PG for Gents, 9th Cross, 1st Stage, HBR Layout, 4th Block, Hennur, Kalyananagar Bengaluru 560 043, in view of his advanced age and medical condition.

2.When this application was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents would oppose stating that the evidence of the witness can always be recorded through video conference. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant came forward to not press this application and has made an endorsement to that effect.

3/5

3.Accordingly, this application is dismissed as not pressed. No costs. 22-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order AY 4/5

DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

AY A No. 2340 of 2026 in T.O.S. No. 31 of 2021 22-06-2026 5/5