V.Mariyappan v. State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.04.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN 1.V.Mariyappan

2. T.Moganakrishnan ... Petitioners Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Udumalpet.

(Crime No.139 of 2025). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in connection with the Crime No.139 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioners : Mr.M.D.Ilayaraja For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.03.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.139 of 2025 registered for the offence under Section 109 of BNS @ 109(1) & 49 of BNS [ Section 307 and 109 of IPC]. 1/6

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, petitioners along with other accused came in a car and hit the defacto complainant, due to which, defacto complainant sustained injuries. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the allegations are false and in any case the petitioners are in custody from 09.03.2025; and that further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioners.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners have no previous cases. He further submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

2/6

6. Considering the nature of allegations; the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital; the fact that the petitioners have no bad antecedents; the period of incarceration; and since further custody is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

3/6

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

08.04.2025 Sma To

1. Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet.

2.The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Udumalpet.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Coimbatore.

4/6

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

SUNDER MOHAN., J.

Sma 08.04.2025 6/6