Villan, v. Nachimuthu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:20.03.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1112 of 2003 1.Villan 2.Rengasamy 3.Ramasamy 4.Easwaran 5.Ammasayathal 6.Marathal 7.Pazhavathal ...Defendants/Appellants/Appellants Vs.

Nachimuthu ... Plaintiff/Respondent/Respondent Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court No.4, Coimbatore) at Tirupur, dated 08.10.2002 in A.S.No.55 of 2002, confirming the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court at Tirupur, dated 20.01.1998 in O.S.No.167 of 1993.

For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondent : No Appearance *****

J U D G M E N T

In this second appeal, learned counsel for the appellants had already reported no instructions and the appellants on being called, remaining absent, Registry was directed to list the matter today i.e., on 20.03.2018, under the caption "for dismissal", by printing the names of the appellants in the cause list.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellants. Appellants called absent. 3.Resultantly, the second appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-viii) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mfa To

1. The Additional District Judge, Additional District Court, (Fast Track Court No.4, Coimbatore) at Tirupur. 2.The District Munsif, District Munsif Court at Tirupur .

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Chennai. (2 COPIES) +2cc to Mr.SARVABHAUMAN ASSO. Advocate, S.R.No. 20872, 20434 S.A.No.1112 of 2003 PVS(CO) TR(04/04/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/