Rajkumar v. State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixth day of May Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.10721 of 2022 1 RAJKUMAR [ PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED ] 2 GOMATHI 3 SARASU 4 MOHANAMBAL Vs STATE REP BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAMATHI VELUR POLICE STATION, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S.K.KALIMUTHU Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that when the complaint filed under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C was received by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramathi, F.I.R. has not yet been registered.

2. In view of above submission, this Court finds that this petition is a pre-mature. Once the F.I.R. is registered, it is open to the petitioner to approach this Court for appropriate remedy. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 06/05/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMATHI.NAMAKKAL.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NAMAKKAL [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAMATHI VELUR POLICE STATION, NAMAKKAL DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.K.KALIMUTHU Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10721/2022 Date :06/05/2022 CSK 13/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/