Tamilmani v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixth day of May Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice G. CHANDRASEKHARAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.10754 of 2022 TAMILMANI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G-3, KILPAUK POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

(CR.NO.82/2022) For Petitioner : M/S.P.SURENDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police, in Crime No. 82 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. When the matter is taken up, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that already the petitioner had filed an Anticipatory Bail Petition and that was dismissed as withdrawn. He further submitted that suppressing the above said fact, the present anticipatory bail petition has been filed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. As the petitioner has suppressed the above said fact, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner and the petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 06/05/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, G-3, KILPAUK POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.P.SURENDRAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10754/2022 Date :06/05/2022 CSK 13/05/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/