← Library
Madras High CourtWP/12228/2022disposed of

U.Rajendiran v. State Rep. By,

2022-05-06Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.05.2022 C O R A M THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.No.12228 of 2022 U.Rajendiran

...Petitioner

Vs

1. State Rep by, The Superintendant of Police, Thiruvallur District.

2. The Inspector of Police, R.K Pettai Police Station, R.K Pettai, Thiruvallur District.

...Respondent

Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to give permission to conduct Aadal Padal (Kalai Nigalchi) in Arul Migu Dhrowpathy Amman Tirukovil in Vilakkanampudi Pudhur, R.K Petai Post, Thiruvallur District on 15.05.2022 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.04.2022.

For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Dinesh Kumar For Respondents :

Mr.R.Murthi, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to give permission to conduct Aadal Padal (Kalai Nigalchi) in Arul Migu Dhrowpathy Amman Tirukovil in Vilakkanampudi Pudhur, R.K Petai Post, Thiruvallur District on 15.05.2022 by considering the petitioner's representation dated 29.04.2022. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The petitioner had made a representation before the respondent police on 29.04.2022 seeking permission to conduct Aadal Padal (Kalai Nigalchi) in Arul Migu Dhrowpathy Amman Tirukovil in Vilakkanampudi Pudhur, R.K Petai Post, Thiruvallur District on 15.05.2022 and the respondent police by an order dated 05.05.2022, refused permission to conduct the function at the concerned Temple.

4.From a perusal of the refusal order of the respondent, it is seen that the reasons stated therein by the respondent police is not satisfactory. It is seen that the respondent police have invented reasons for refusing permission and it is obviously not a good reason for refusal. Therefore, the order passed by the respondent police on 05.05.2022 is set aside. 5.The respondent police is now directed to issue a fresh order within a period of two (2) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Tsg/rst To:

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thiruvallur District.

2. The Inspector of Police, R.K Pettai Police Station, R.K Pettai, Thiruvallur District.

+1cc to Mr.R.Dinesh Kumar, Advocate SR. No. 31238 W.P.No.12228 of 2022 RR (CO) PR (11/05/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/