Chennai Autolinks Pvt Ltd v. The Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 14.09.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM W.P. No.10913 of 2020 and WMP.No.13258 of 2020 Chennai Autolinks Private Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Mr.R.Sivakumar .. Petitioner
Versus
1.The Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.
2.The Tahsildar, Ambattur, Chennai 600 053.
3.The Tahsildar, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056.
4.The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union Office, Vanagaram, Chennai-Tiruttani Road, Kamarjapuram, Ambattur, Chennai 600 0053.
5.The Inspector of Police, Maduravoyal Police Station, Chennai 600 095.
6.The Executive Officer/Secretary, Vanagaram Panchayat, 7.The Village Administrative Officer,
8. Loheswari .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 7 to prevent any kind of
encroachment or any blockade over the 24 feet Panchayat Road lying on the eastern side of the petitioner-company at Plot Nos.98, 99, 100, 101, Krishna Industrial Estate, Mettukuppam, For petitioner : Mr.C.Umashankar For respondents for RR1 to 3, 5 & 7: Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik for RR6 & 4 : Mrs.Indhumathi for Mr.D.Suriyanarayanan for R8 : Mr.E.Om Prakash, Senior Counsel Mr.G.Veepathran
ORDER
(The Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J) The Writ Petition is heard through video conferencing.
2. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 7 to prevent any kind of encroachment or any blockade over the 24 feet Panchayat Road lying on the eastern side of the petitioner-company at Plot Nos.98, 99, 100, 101, Krishna Industrial Estate, Mettukuppam, Vanagaram, Chennai 600 095.
3. It is the submission of Mr.C.Umashankar, learned counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance of the order of this Court, dated 30.04.2021, the encroachment made by the eighth respondent has been removed and in this regard, he relied upon the status report filed by the third respondent.
4. Mr.E.Om Prakash, learned Senior Counsel, appearing for Mr.G.Veepathran, learned counsel for the eighth respondent would state that the petitioner has encroached public road and there was no encroachment made by the eighth respondent. However, the third respondent without putting on notice on the eighth respondent, removed the gate put up at the entrance of the eighth respondent's Company.
5. In the light of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are of the considered opinion that nothing survives for adjudication in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, it is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs To
1. The Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.
2. The Tahsildar, Ambattur, Chennai 600 053.
3. The Tahsildar, Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056.
4. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union Office, Vanagaram, Chennai-Tiruttani Road, Kamarjapuram, Ambattur, Chennai 600 0053.
5. The Inspector of Police, Maduravoyal Police Station, Chennai 600 095.
6. The Executive Officer/Secretary, Vanagaram Panchayat,
7. The Village Administrative Officer, +1cc to Mr.C.Umashankar, Advocate, S.R.No.46317 +1cc to Mr.G.Veerapathiran, Advocate, S.R.No.46350 +1cc to Mr.D.Suriyanarayanan, Advocate, S.R.No.46752 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.46867, 46839 W.P. No.10913 of 2020 KSM(CO) CB(01/11/2021)