Madras High CourtWP/12623/2021disposed of

K.Murugan v. The District Collector,

2021-06-28Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.No.12623 of 2021 K.Murugan .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, O/o. The District Collector, Villupruam, Villupuram District - 605602.

2. The District Revenue Officer, O/o the District Revenue Officer, Villupuram Town and Taluk, Villupuram District 605602.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o The Revenue Divisional Office, Tindivanam Town and Taluk, Villupuram District 604301.

4. The Revenue Tahsildhar, O/o The Revenue The Tahsildar, Tindivanam Town and Taluk, Villuppuram District 604 301.

5. The Village Administrative Officer, O/o The Village Administrative Officer, No.13, Kolliyangkunam Revenue Village, Mailam Post, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District - 604 304.

.. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 herein to update the petitioner's land Patta No.vide Aa 2.T.K.T.No.152/2012, Pasali No.1422, dated 06.08.2012 the extent of land 0.87.0 ares (2.17 1/2 acres) in computer and online after making sub division as Survey No.108/5 from the existed Survey No.108/2 after altered the 'A' Registrar and field map of Blue print of the Village Revenue Records and accounts of the Village No.139, Kolliyangkunam Revenue Village, Mailam Post, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District, on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 26.05.2021.

For Petitioner : Mr.Dalit Tiger C.Ponnusamy For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Government Advocate - - - - -

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) According to the petitioner, on 06.08.2012, an extent of 0.87.0 ares of land were assigned to the petitioner in Survey No.108/2 and he is in possession and enjoyment over the land. Since the revenue records have not been mutated in the name of the petitioner, he sent various representations to the authorities concerned. The first respondent District Collector also on 13.02.2021, directed the fourth respondent Revenue Tahsildar to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders and no orders have been passed. Hence the petitioner again sent a representation on 26.05.2021, but so far no orders have been passed, hence he filed the present writ petition.

2. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that the fourth respondent will consider the said representation of the petitioner and will pass suitable orders on merit.

3. Considering the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court directs the fourth respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 26.05.2021 and pass suitable orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kk To