H.Yogeshwaran v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.09.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH Crl.R.C.No.665 of 2020 H.Yogeshwaran ...
Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Keelaiyur Police Station, Nagapattinam District.
(Crime No.36 of 2020) ...
Respondent/Respondent Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.1637 of 2020 on the file of the District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam District dated 01.07.2020 and grant interim custody of the vehicle bearing Reg.No.TN 55 AK 6809 in favour of the petitioner. For Petitioner :
Mr.U.Kathirvan For Respondent :
Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
This case is taken up through video conferencing.
2. This criminal revision has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 01.07.2020 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1637 of 2020 by the District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam District, and grant interim custody of the vehicle bearing Reg.No.TN 55 AK 6809 in favour of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner is the owner of the vehicle (Torres lorry) bearing Registration No.TN-55-AK-6809, which was seized on 20.02.2020, while transporting clay sand and a case was registered in Crime No.36 of 2020 for the offence under Sections
379 IPC and 21(1) of the Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957. The petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.1637 of 2020 before the District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, under Section 451 Cr.P.C. for interim custody of the vehicle, which was dismissed on 01.07.2020, challenging which, the petitioner has preferred the present revision petition.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this petitioner has filed Crl.OP.No.11611 of 2020, before this Court seeking anticipatory bail and that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail with certain conditions, also directing him to deposit Rs.60,000/- and the same has been complied with.
5. Heard Mr.U.Kathirvan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs.P.Kritika Kamal, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent/State.
6. It is seen that the seizure was effected on 20.02.2020 and the vehicle is in the police station open to sun and rain.
7. Normally, this Court, will direct the petitioner to deposit Rs.1,00,000/- to the credit of District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust, but in this case, there is no reference to the number of units of clay sand in the F.I.R. and that apart, the petitioner has deposited Rs.60,000/- in compliance with the order passed by this Court in Crl.OP.No.11611 of 2020 for Anticipatory Bail. Hence, it is suffice if the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs.25,000/- only with the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust.
8. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and in view of the guidelines given by the Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat reported in (2002) 10 SCC 290, this Court is of the view that interests of justice will be served, if the vehicle is ordered to be released to the petitioner on certain stringent conditions. The respondent police is directed to grant interim custody of the said vehicle (Torres lorry) bearing Registration No.TN-55-AK-6809 to the petitioner within a period of 7 days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned condition Nos.(i) to (iii) :
(i) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- before the jurisdictional Tahsildar as nonrefundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount, the same will have to be deposited by the Tahsildar, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation Trust, Nagapattinam, as non-refundable deposit;
(ii ) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam. The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and give the copies of their Aadhaar Card;
(ii i) The petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondent/ authority concerned stating that he will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondent and also the trial Court, failing which the respondent/trial Court is at liberty to confiscate the vehicle;
(iv ) The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned;
(v) The petitioner shall take photograph of the vehicle and submit the same along with Compact Disc duly certified under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872;
(vi ) The petitioner shall surrender the original R.C. book before the District and Sessions Court, Nagapattinam; and (vi i) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondent. Petition relating to return of R.C. Book for any purpose in the future, may be filed before the District and Sessions Court,
Nagapattinam, who may consider the same on merits, though this order has been passed by the High Court.
8. This petition is allowed in the above terms and the order dated 01.07.2020 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1637 of 2020 by the District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, is set aside. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam 2.The Tahsildar, Nagapattinam.
3.The Inspector of Police, Keelaiyur Police Station, Nagapattinam District.
4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai - 600 104.
Crl.R.C.No.665 of 2020 vg I[co] srg 01/10/2020