N.Meenakshi Sundaram, v. Department Of School Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.02.2024 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN N.Meenakshi Sundaram ...
Petitioner Vs.
1.
Department of School Education, Rep. by its Secretary, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
The Teachers Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Chairman, 4th Floor, EVK Sampath Malligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai - 600 009.
The Department of Higher Education, Rep. by its Secretary, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
The Rehabilitation Council of India, rep. by its Member Secretary, B-22, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi - 110 016.
5.
The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.
...Respondents
Page No.1 of 4
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents herein to consider the representation dated 26.08.2016 directing the second respondent to frame a procedure and fix a criteria in such a manner by considering only the Special Education Category in B.Ed., for recruiting Special Teachers and enable the petitioner herein to participate in the selection process of Special Teachers as announced in the Government Notification G.O.Ms.No.28 dated 30.01.2015.
For petitioner : No appearance For R1 & R3 : Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government Advocate For R2 :
Mr.Kathiravan Standing Counsel For R4 :
Mr.M.E.Saraswathy
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.08.2016 and to frame a procedure for the post of Special Teachers as announced in the Government Notification G.O.Ms.No.28 dated 30.01.2015, enabling him to participate in the selection process.
The learned Government Advocate representing the first and Page No.2 of 4
third respondents is present, learned Standing Counsel for the second respondent is present and also the learned counsel representing the fourth respondent is present.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today, this matter is listed under the caption "for orders", even then the petitioner is not being represented. Even on an earlier occasion there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this case and hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Costs made easy.
08.02.2024 vca Internet :
Yes/No Index :
Yes/No Citation :
Yes/No Page No.3 of 4
Dr.D.NAGARJUN,J.
vca To:
1.
The Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
The Chairman Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, EVK Sampath Malligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai - 600 009.
The Secretary Department of Higher Education, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
The Member Secretary, Rehabilitation Council of India, B-22, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi - 110 016.
5.
The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006.
08.02.2024 Page No.4 of 4