Madras High CourtWP/11028/2024disposed of

Thangarasu v. The District Collector

2024-04-24Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice J.Sathya Narayana Prasad5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.04.2024 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Thangarasu ..

Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector Perambalur District, Perambalur.

2. The Assistant Director of Panchayat Perambalur District, Perambalur.

3. The Tahsildar Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District.

4. The Block Development Officer Alathur Panchayat Union Alathur, Perambalur District.

5. The President Pilimisai Village Panchayat Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District.

6. The Inspector of Police Maruvathur Police Station Perambalur District.

7. Ramesh

8. Muthusamy ..

Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents 3 to 6 to remove the encroachments in Old Survey No.430/1 New Survey No.193/1, Classified as Government Poramboke Land situate at Aadhanur South, Pilimisail Village, Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District in Lake Poramboke based on the communication dated 20.12.2023 to the 5th respondent by the 4th respondent in Na.Ka.No.2711/2021 /AA3. For the Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran For the Respondents : Mr.C.Kathiravan Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.Habeeb Rahman for R4 and R5 Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor for R6 No Appearance for R7 and R8

ORDER

(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard MrC.Prabakaran, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.C.Kathiravan, learned Special Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3, Mr.Habbeb Rahman, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 4 and 5 and Mr.R.Muniyapparaj, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.6.

2. Learned Special Government Pleader submits that the officials would take steps under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The said steps would commence within a period of three months from today.

3. It is made clear that we have not observed anything on the merits of the matter. If notice is issued, the aggrieved person, if any, may file a reply to the said notice and may take all the defences available.

4. The writ petition, accordingly, stands disposed of. There shall be no orders as to costs.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (J.S.N.P., J.) 24.04.2024 Index :

Yes/No :

Yes/No drm