The Inspector Of Police v. Gopi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Crl.R.C.No.510 of 2009 The Inspector of Police, Pallavaram Police Station.

Crime No.295 of 2007.

... Petitioner Vs.

1. Gopi

2. Shankar

3. Anand

4. Moorthy

5. Dilip Alias Malar

6. Kathir ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed against the order dated 20.01.2009 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Chengalpet, in Crl.M.P.No.818 of 2008.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Arul, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) - - - - -

ORDER

In this case, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State has filed a report stating that a case was registered in Crime No.295 of 2007 under Section "Man Missing" @ 302 IPC and charge sheet was filed against the respondents 1 to 6/A.1 to A.6 on 17.09.2007 and the same was submitted before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpet, and it was taken on file vide P.R.C.No.46 of 2007, dated 27.09.2007. Subsequently, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions and it was taken on file by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Chengalpet, as S.C.No.140 of 2008, dated 11.06.2008 and after full-fledged trial, the respondents/A.1 to A.6 were acquitted by an order dated 28.02.2009.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The above status report filed by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) is recorded. In view of the fact that the case itself is ended in acquittal, this Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Chengalpet.

2. do thro the Principal Sessions Judge, Chengalpet.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

ppa(co) prk13/7 Crl.R.C.No.510 of 2009 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/