Madras High CourtWP/13765/2024disposed of

D.Palanisamy, v. The District Collector,

2024-06-06Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.06.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR W.P.No.13765 of 2024 D.Palanisamy .. Petitioner

Versus

1. The District Collector, Namakkal District, District Collectorate, Namakkal.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Namakkal Taluk & District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal.

4. The Tahsildar, Paramathy Taluk, Namakkal District.

5. The Revenue Inspector, Jedarpalayam, Paramathy Taluk, Namakkal District.

6. The Village Administrative Officer, Solasiramani Village and Post, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District.

7. Elayappan

8. Ragumani

9. Palaniyappan

10. Ramasamy .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to 1/5

consider and dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner in Na.Ka.No.15942/2022/O2 dated 17.05.2022 pending on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.L.Thirumalaisamy For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran, Special Government Pleader - R1 to R6

ORDER

With the consent of both sides, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ petition is filed to direct the second respondent to consider and dispose of the revision petition filed by the petitioner in Na.Ka.No.15942/2022/O2 dated 17.05.2022 pending on the file of the second respondent.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 6 and perused the materials available on record.

2/5

4. The case of the petitioner is that the subject properties have been purchased by the petitioner vide sale deed dated 16.04.2010. While so, the seventh respondent is said to have made a representation to the third respondent on 02.11.2021 alleging that the property comprised in S.No.30/2D and 2F are ancestral properties of the respondents 7 to 10 for which the petitioner's predecessors in title and the petitioner filed their objection before the third respondent. The third respondent without considering the objection filed by the petitioner and his predecessor in title removed the name of the petitioner in the patta. As against the same, the petitioner along with his predecessor in title filed a revision before the second respondent on 17.05.2022 and the same is pending without any progress. Hence, the present Writ Petition.

5. Considering the limited prayer sought for by the writ petition, without going into the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner dated 17.05.2022 on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties interested, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 3/5

6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 06.06.2024 vrc Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No : Yes/No To,

1. The District Collector, Namakkal District, District Collectorate, Namakkal.

2. The District Revenue Officer, Namakkal Taluk & District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal.

4. The Tahsildar, Paramathy Taluk, Namakkal District.

5. The Revenue Inspector, Jedarpalayam, Paramathy Taluk, Namakkal District.

6. The Village Administrative Officer, Solasiramani Village and Post, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. 4/5

N. SATHISH KUMAR , J.

vrc W.P.No.13765 of 2024 06.06.2024 5/5