Mathiazhgan v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Mathiazhagan ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Salem Rural District, Salem.

2. The Inspector of Police, Karumanaikudal Police Station, Salem Rural District.

3. Thangavelu

4. Yamuna

5. Alamelu

6. Rithick

7. Munusamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to order the second respondent herein to give the police protection to the Petitioner and his family members based on the representation dated 17.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Rajkumar For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.side)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the second respondent herein to give police protection to the Petitioner and his family members based on the representation dated 17.03.2025.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondents 1 and 2 and perused the materials available on record.

3. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the writ petition, the second respondent is directed to issue notice to the petitioner and the respondents 3 to 7 herein, consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

08.04.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order mn

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Salem Rural District, Salem.

2. The Inspector of Police, Karumanaikudal Police Station, Salem Rural District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn 08.04.2025