Yuvaraj v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.10470 of 2021 Yuvaraj ... Petitioner Vs.

State Rep by The Inspector of Police, K-10 Koyambedu Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.1190 of 2020) ... Respondent Prayer:

Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.1190 of 2020 on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Dasarathan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner who was remanded to judicial custody on 20.02.2021 for the offence under Section 392 of IPC in Cr.No.1190 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner is alleged to have robbed the defacto complainant's mobile. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner is a habitual offender and that there are ten previous cases pending against the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there are ten previous cases pending against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, the criminal original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 16/06/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-10, KOYAMBEDU POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.P.DASARATHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10470/2021 Date :16/06/2021 SRG 28/06/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/