Vimal v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.10497 of 2021 Vimal ... Petitioner Vs.

The State rep by ... Respondent The Sub Inspector of Police, Meensurutti Police Station, (Crime No.183 of 2021) Prayer:

Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.183 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sundar Raman For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.04.2021 for the offence under Sections 294(b) and 307 of IPC in Cr.No.183 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner along with the other accused is alleged to have attacked the defacto complainant's husband.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that there are five previous cases pending against the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there are five previous cases pending against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the criminal original petition is dismissed. -sd/- 16/06/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MEENSURUTTI POLICE STATION.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY.

CC to M/S.V.SUNDAR RAMAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.10497/2021 Date :16/06/2021 TA-28/06/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/