← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP/11512/2025ordered

Vicky @ Vignesh v. State By, Inspector Of Police,

2025-06-19Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED:19.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN in Crl.A.No.664 of 2025 Vicky @ Vignesh S/o. Velu, No.31/18, Kumaresan Street, Kaspa-B, Ambur, Tirupathur District - 635 802.

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State by its The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station, Tirupathur District.

(Crime No. 400 of 2017) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 430 (1) of BNSS 2023 to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner / appellant by the learned Sessions Judge at Tirupathur District by judgment passed in S.C.No.247 of 2018 dated 27.02.2025 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the criminal appeal.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Marimuthu For Respondent : Mr.S.Raja Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners, to suspend the sentence imposed on the petitioner / appellant by the learned Sessions Judge at Tirupathur District by judgment passed in S.C.No.247 of 2018 dated 27.02.2025 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the criminal appeal.

2. The petitioner herein is the accused in S.C.No.247 of 2018 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge at Tirupathur District. He was found guilty of the offences and he has been convicted and sentenced as under: S.No.

Conviction Sentence Section 326 IPC To undergo one year simple imprisonment and pay fine of Rs.15,000/- and in default to undergo imprisonment for a period of three months.

Aggrieved by the same, the Criminal Appeal along with the present miscellaneous petition has been filed.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners/accused would submit that

there are arguable points available in the Criminal Appeal and the petitioner/accused has got a fair chance of succeeding in the Criminal Appeal and hence, the substantive sentence imposed against the petitioner/accused may be suspended. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to abide the condition imposed by this Court.

4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent/State raised serious objection for allowing this petition. Further, he would contend that the evidences recorded from the prosecution witnesses would prove the case of the prosecution beyond reasonable doubt. According to him, interference of this Court is not necessary in the findings arrived at by the trial Court. 5.

Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and also perused the materials placed on record.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case coupled with the quantum of punishment imposed upon the petitioner, also by

considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police, further this criminal appeal is not likely to be taken for final hearing in the near future, this Court is of the view that the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone can be suspended on certain conditions. 7.

Accordingly, till the disposal of the Criminal Appeal the substantive sentence of imprisonment imposed by the learned trial Judge is alone suspended and bail is granted on the following conditions: (a) The petitioner/accused is ordered to be released on bail, on his executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge at Tirupathur District.

(b) The petitioner/accused and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impressions in the surety bonds and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar Cards or Bank Pass Books to ensure their identities. (c) The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on the first working day of every English Calendar month at 10.30 a.m., until the disposal of the Criminal Appeal and if he is not able to appear before the trial Court on the said day, he shall

make arrangements to file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the trial Court. 8.

With the above directions, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

19.06.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Internet : Yes Speaking/non-speaking order bkn

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

bkn To

1. The Sessions Judge at Tirupathur District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Ambur Town Police Station, Tirupathur District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

in Crl.A.No.664 of 2025 19.06.2025