A.Dharman v. The Additional Chief Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 07.09.2018 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Satrughana Pujahari Writ Petition No.17272 of 2017 A.Dharman
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Additional Chief Secretary, Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.
2.The District Collector, Erode.
3.The District Revenue Officer, Erode.
...
Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the third respondent to dispose of petitioner's representation dated 06.04.2017.
For Petitioner : M/s.S.Vijayakumar For Respondents : Mrs. R.Janaki, AGP
ORDER
Heard Mr.S.Vijayakumar, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.R.Janaki, the learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. With the consent of the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for disposal.
2. The case of the petitioner is that he being inducted in a criminal case, was not allowed to retire from service, and in the meanwhile, the criminal case against him is ended in acquittal. Thereafter, the petitioner has submitted a representation on 06.04.2017 to the third respondent, to allow him to retire and disburse his https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
retirement benefits. Such representation having not been considered, he has come to this Court, seeking a direction to consider his representation dated 06.04.2017, in a time bound manner.
3. Regard being had to the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and also considering the limited prayer made by the petitioner, this Court without going into the materials placed on record, directs the third respondent to take an informed and considered decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 06.04.2017, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, provided the same is pending till date and communicate such decision to the petitioner. However, it is made clear that the direction of this Court should not be considered as a mandate to dispose of the representation of the petitioner in any particular manner.
4. With the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No Costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Co) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mfa/dn To 1.The Additional Chief Secretary, Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.
2.The District Collector, Erode.
3.The District Revenue Officer, Erode.
+1cc to M/s.S.Vijayakumar , Advocate SR.No. 62309 Writ Petition No.17272 of 2017 ASK(05/10/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/