Lakshmi v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.10.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.Nos.13081 to 13085, 13137 to 13141 and 13210 to 13214 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.15372, 15374 to 15377, 15442, 15444, 15446, 15448, 15450 and 15559 to 15567 of 2018 1.Lakshmi 2.Sayammal 3.Rukmani 4.Appusamy 5.Nagaraj 6.Ayyasamy 7.Subbathaal 8.Ayyammal 9.Kalimuthu 10.Mariappan 11.Rajeswari 12.Karuppusamy 13.Vijayakumar 14.Marimuthu 15.Selvaraj 16.Ilangeshwaran 17.Uma Sarasu 18.Ganesan 19.Iyammal 20.Kalamani 21.Jeevanandam 22.Vanitha 23.Saayammal 24.Selvi 25.Kaliyammal 26.vijaya 27.Jothimani 28.Kalimuthu
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13081 of 2018
1.Kandhasami Konar 2.Inthirani 3.Rajammal 4.Devaraj 5.Harichandran 6.Sudamani 7.Iyyammal
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13082 of 2018
1.N.Palanisamy
...Petitioner in W.P.No.13083 of 2018
1.S.Loganathan
...Petitioner in W.P.No.13084 of 2018
1.M.Paranjothi
...Petitioner in W.P.No.13085 of 2018
1.Rangammal 2.Murugan 3.Neelavathi 4.K.P.Balasubramaniam 5.Saraswathi 6.K.P.Shanmugam 7.Sagunthala
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13137 of 2018
1.Subbathaal 2.Shanmugam 3.Lakshmi 4.Krishnasamy 5.Kaliyammal 6.Kanagaraj 7.Ilangovan 8.Purusothaman 9.Mogan 10.Aadhijeyam 11.Palaniammal 12.Jothimani 13.Rajamani 14.Aiyaasamy 15.Sarojini 16.Sagunthala 17.Mallika 18.Saravanakumar
19.Pradeep 20.Karuppasamy 21.Kalaamani 22.Maruthachalam 23.Santhi
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13138 of 2018
1.Varuthathaal 2.Ranganayagi 3.Loganathan 4.Pechimuthu
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13139 of 2018
1.Neelavathi 2.K.P.Balasubramaniam 3.Saraswathi 4.K.P.Shanmugam 5.Sagunthala 6.Renukadevi 7.Ragupathi 8.Eshwari 9.Neelavathi 10.Rangammal
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13140 of 2018
1.Ammasai 2.Varuthamani 3.Varadharaj 4.Ramasamy
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13141 of 2018
1.K.S.Palanisamy 2.K.S.Ramasamy
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13210 of 2018
1.K.M.Palanisamy
...Petitioner in W.P.No.13211 of 2018
1.Ayyasamy 2.Ranganathan 3.Arumugam 4.Dhanabakkiyam 5.Venkatachala Konar
6.Ramasamy 7.Kokilaveni 8.Thamaraikannan 9.Ranjini devi 10.Arunkumar
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13212 of 2018
1.Gopalakrishnan 2.Rukmani 3.Angamuthu 4.Pushpam 5.Umamageshwari 6.Thirumoorthy 7.Parameshwari 8.Sundaram 9.Nagarathinam 10.Sagunthala devi 11.Velumani 12.Munusamy 13.Bagavathi 14.Angamuthu 15.Saraswathi 16.Balakrishnan 17.Suganthi Mani 18.Muthukumaran 19.Parimala 20.Kavitha
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13213 of 2018
1.Amirtham 2.Jayanthi 3.Suryaprabha 4.Karthikeyan 5.Sujitha 6.Padmavathy 7.Rajendiran 8.Santhamani 9.Suseela 10.Nirmala 11.Lakshmanan 12.Inthirani 13.Lakshmi
14.Damodharan 15.Velumani 16.Balagurusamy 17.Nirmala 18.Sarojini 19.Vimala 20.Savithri 21.Rangarajan 22.Aandal 23.Santha
...Petitioners in W.P.No.13214 of 2018
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Chairman and Managing Director, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
3.The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
4.The Corporation of Coimbatore, Represented by its Commissioner, Office of the Corporation of Coimbatore, Coimbatore.
5.The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
6.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore.
7.The Tahsildar, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District.
8.The Special Tahsildar (LA), Coimbatore Water Supply Scheme, Coimbatore.
...Respondents in all WPs.
Prayer in W.P.No.13081 of 2018 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Declaration, declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the first respondent culminating in Award No.2/1986 dated 28.04.1986 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No.567 admeasuring about 6.10 acres and Survey No.568 admeasuring about 4.45 acres in Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013). Prayer in W.P.No.13082 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.8/1985 dated 14.10.
1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No.582/3 admeasuring about 1.28 acres at Vellalur Village Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013). Prayer in W.P.No.13083 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.9 of 1985 dated 18.10.1985 and Award No.7 of 1985 dated 30.08.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No.596, 580/2 and 581/3 admeasuring about 3.
47 acres in Vellalure Village, Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).
Prayer in W.P.No.13084 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.9 of 1985 dated 18.10.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No.593 admeasuring about 6.22 acres and in Vellalur Village Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013). Prayer in W.P.No.13085 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.7 of 1985 dated 30.08.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No. 581/1 admeasuring about 1.56 acres in Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair
Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013). Prayer in W.P.No.13137 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.1/1986 dated 26.12.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in survey No.572/1 admeasuring about 3.42, acres and survey No.572/2 admeasuring about 3.10 in Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk, (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).
Prayer in W.P.No.13138 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.1 of 1986 dated 26.12.1985 and award No.2 of 1986 dated 28.04.1986 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in survey No.463/1, 463/2, 461, 460 admeasuring about 5.77 1/4, acres in Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk, (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act 2013 (Act 30 of 2013). Prayer in W.P.No.13139 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.14 of 1985 dated 19.12.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in survey No.
635 admeasuring about 2.85 acres in Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk, (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act 2013 (Act 30 of 2013). Prayer in W.P.No.13140 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.1 of 1986 dated 26.12.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in survey No.459 admeasuring about 4.47 acres at Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).
Pralyer in W.P.No.13141 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.7/1985 dated 30.08.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in survey No.576/1 admeasuring about 0.84 acres and survey No.
about 0.96 acres in Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk, (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).
Prayer in W.P.No.13210 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.1/1986 dated 26.12.1985 passed by the 8th Respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No.468/1 admeasuring about 2.63 cent and Survey No.467 admeasuring about 1.54 cent at Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore Dist., as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).
Prayer in W.P.No.13211 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.8 of 1985 dated 14.10.1985 and award no.7 of 1985 dated 30.08.1985 passed by the 8th Respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No.581/1 admeasuring about 1.56 acres, Survey No.586/2 admeasuring about 0.03 acres, Survey No.588/1 admeasuring about 3.01 acres, and survey No.589/1 admeasuring about 1.96 acres in Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore Dist., as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013). Prayer in W.P.No.
13212 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.9 of 1985 dated 18.10.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No.598 admeasuring about 2.97 acres in Vellalur Village, Madhukkarai Taluk (then Coimbatore Taluk), Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation & Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013) Prayer in W.P.No.13213 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No.9/1985 dated 18.10.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey No.598 admeasuring about 2.
Prayer in W.P.No.13214 of 2018 : Declaring that the entire acquisition proceedings initiated by the 1st respondent culminating in Award No. 8/1985 dated 14.10.1985 passed by the 8th respondent in respect of lands comprised in Survey Nos.582/1, 582/2, 584/1 and 584/2 admeasuring about 5.71 1/2 acres in Vellalur Village, Madhakkarai Taluk, (then Coimbatore Taluk) Coimbatore District as lapsed by operation of law in view of Section 24(2) of the right to fair compensation and transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Act 30 of 2013).
For Petitioners in all W.Ps : *Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Senior Counsel for Mr.R.D.Ashok Kumar For Respondents in all W.Ps.
:
Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan Government Advocate (R1, R3, R5 to R8) :
Mr.R.Ganesh Babu (for R2) :
Mr.K.Magesh Standing Counsel (for R4) C O M M O N O R D E R These writ petitions have been filed to issue a writ of declaration, declaring that the land acquisition proceedings in respect of the petitioners' properties as lapsed by virtue of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 'the New Act' for short).
2. The case of the petitioners is that they owned their respective portion of the lands situated at Vellalur Village, Madhukkari Taluk, Coimbatore District. While being so, the first respondent initiated acquisition proceedings issued notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short) for the purpose of constructing a sewerage farm. However, even after a lapse of 30 years, the respondents have not taken possession of the lands and they have not used the said lands for the purpose for which they were acquired. Therefore, after the New Act, the petitioners challenged the entire acquisition proceedings on the ground that the possession of the subject properties had not been taken even till today. The petitioners are not paid any compensation for the acquisition lands. Therefore, the entire acquisition proceedings have lapsed as per Section 24(2) of the New Act.
3. The respondents 1, 2 and 4th filed common counter affidavit and stated that totally 657 acres of lands in Vellalore and Kurinchi Village of Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District were acquired by the eighth respondent herein for the purpose of sewerage Farm and construction sewerage Treatment Plant to the Coimbatore Corporation. The work was administratively sanctioned by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.107, R.D & L.A Department, dated 23.01.1980. The entire extent acquired has been split up into 18 blocks for submission of draft notification under Section 4(1) of the Act. Thereafter, the awards had been passed on various dates and the compensation amount was deposited in the Civil Court, most of the land owners were received the compensation amount from the eighth respondent.
The acquired lands were handed over to the Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board on 10.11.1986 and 06.12.1986 by the eighth respondent. The Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, in turn handed over the possession to the Coimbatore Corporation on 09.10.1988 and at present, the Coimbatore Corporation is in possession of the entire lands and the Coimbatore Corporation also obtained patta in their favour, vide patta No.700 and the Corporation is enjoying the same. In fact, the Director of Town Panchayat requested the Coimbatore Corporation to allot 2 acres of land in Survey No.659 for the purpose of bu terminus to Vellalore Town Panchayat. As per Council resolution No.19 dated 11.06.2014, the Coimbatore Corporation accorded permission for allotment and the same was considered and granted by the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.
31, dated 12.02.2016.
4. All the petitioners raised grounds that they were neither paid any compensation nor the possession of their respective properties was taken. Therefore, the entire acquisition proceedings have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the New Act.
5. Heard Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1, 3 to 5 and Mr.R.Ganesh Babu, learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent and Mr.K.Magesh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the fourth respondent.
6. On a perusal of the records, it reveals that admittedly, the Land Acquisition Proceedings have been initiated by Section 4(1) notification dated 24.07.1981. Thereafter, proper enquiry was conducted and various awards have been passed on various dates in respect of their lands comprised in various survey numbers situated at Vellalur Village, Madhukkari Taluk, Coimbatore District. As stated supra, the possession of the properties had already been taken by the Coimbatore Corporation, which had also obtained patta in their favour, vide patta No.700 including the petitioners' lands. The awards had been passed on various dates and the compensation amount was deposited in the
Civil Court and that most of the land owners have also received the compensation amount from the eighth respondent.
7. The grounds raised by the petitioners in these Writ Petition have already been settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the judgment reported in (2020) 8 SCC 129 in the case of Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and ors etc., which held as follows:- "366. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we answer the questions as under:
1. Under the provisions of Section 24(1) (a) in case the award is not made as on 1.1.2014 the date of commencement of Act of 2013, there is no lapse of proceedings. Compensation has to be determined under the provisions of Act of 2013.
2. In case the award has been passed within the window period of five years excluding the period covered by an interim order of the court, then proceedings shall continue as provided under Section 24(1)(b) of the Act of 2013 under the Act of 1894 as if it has not been repealed.
3. The word or used in Section 24(2) between possession and compensation has to be read as nor or as and. The deemed lapse of land acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 takes place where due to inaction of authorities for five years or more prior to commencement of the said Act, the possession of land has not been taken nor compensation has been paid. In other words, in case possession has been taken, compensation has not been paid then there is no lapse. Similarly, if compensation has been paid, possession has not been taken then there is no lapse.
4. The expression 'paid' in the main part of Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 does not include a deposit of compensation in court. The consequence of non-deposit is provided in proviso to Section 24(2) in case it has not been deposited with respect to majority of land holdings then all beneficiaries (landowners) as on the date of notification for land acquisition under Section 4 of the Act of 1894 shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 2013. In case the obligation under Section 31 of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 has not been fulfilled,
interest under Section 34 of the said Act can be granted. Non-deposit of compensation (in court) does not result in the lapse of land acquisition proceedings. In case of non-deposit with respect to the majority of holdings for five years or more, compensation under the Act of 2013 has to be paid to the "landowners" as on the date of notification for land acquisition under Section 4 of the Act of 1894.
5. In case a person has been tendered the compensation as provided under Section 31(1) of the Act of 1894, it is not open to him to claim that acquisition has lapsed under Section 24(2) due to non-payment or non-deposit of compensation in court. The obligation to pay is complete by tendering the amount under Section 31(1). Land owners who had refused to accept compensation or who sought reference for higher compensation, cannot claim that the acquisition proceedings had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013.
6. The proviso to Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 is to be treated as part of Section 24
(2) not part of Section 24(1)(b).
7. The mode of taking possession under the Act of 1894 and as contemplated under Section 24(2) is by drawing of inquest report/ memorandum. Once award has been passed on taking possession under Section 16 of the Act of 1894, the land vests in State there is no divesting provided under Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013, as once possession has been taken there is no lapse under Section 24(2).
8. The provisions of Section 24(2) providing for a deemed lapse of proceedings are applicable in case authorities have failed due to their inaction to take possession and pay compensation for five years or more before the Act of 2013 came into force, in a proceeding for land acquisition pending with concerned authority as on 1.1.2014. The period of subsistence of interim orders passed by court has to be excluded in the computation of five years.
9. Section 24(2) of the Act of 2013 does not give rise to new cause of action to question the legality of concluded proceedings of land acquisition. Section 24 applies to a proceeding pending on the date of enforcement of the Act of 2013, i.e., 1.1.2014. It does not
revive stale and time-barred claims and does not reopen concluded proceedings nor allow landowners to question the legality of mode of taking possession to reopen proceedings or mode of deposit of compensation in the treasury instead of court to invalidate acquisition."
8. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India settled all proposition of law in the above judgment including the grounds raised by the petitioners. Admittedly, these Writ Petitions have been filed after 30 years of the acquisition of the lands. The awards had been passed on various dates and the possession of the acquired lands were also handed over to the Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board on 10.11.1986 and 06.12.1986 by the Special Tahsildar (L.A). The Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, in turn, handed over the possession to the Coimbatore Corporation on 09.10.1988 itself. The compensation amount was also deposited in the Civil Court. Therefore, the petitioners failed to satisfy the twin requirements under Section 24 (2) of the New Act, i.e.
, the physical possession of the land was not taken and the compensation has not been paid/tendered/deposited in accordance with law. In view of the above dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the issues raised by the petitioners were settled and therefore, the acquisition proceedings had not lapsed by operation of law under Section 24 (2) of the new Act i.e., Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. In view of the settled position of law, the writ petition is devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed.
9. In the result, these Writ Petitions stand dismissed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) Dated : 22.11.2021 Corrected as per the Order made in Case Nos.13081 to 13085, 13137 to 13141 and 13210 to 13214 of 2018 dated 28/10/2021 Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) Dated : 01/12/2021 // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar kv
To 1.The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Fort St.George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Chairman and Managing Director, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
3.The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
4.The Corporation of Coimbatore, Represented by its Commissioner, Office of the Corporation of Coimbatore, Coimbatore.
5.The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
6.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Coimbatore.
7.The Tahsildar, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District.
8.The Special Tahsildar (LA), Coimbatore Water Supply Scheme, Coimbatore.
+2ccs to Mr.K.Magesh, Advocate SR.Nos.51765, 51766 +1cc to Mr.R.Ganesh Babu, Advocate SR.No.51927 +2ccs to the Government Pleader SR.Nos.52008, 52009 +2ccs to Mr.R.D.Ashok Kumar, Advocate SR.No.55687 W.P.No.13081of 2018 etc., batch SR-II(CO) RVM(07/12/2021)