Lokesh Gupta v. S.Yeitish

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 08.01.2016 Coram :

The Hon'ble Mr.Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Chief Justice O.P.No.895 of 2015 Lokesh Gupta .. Petitioner -vsS.Yeitish .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 (5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, read with Rule 2 of the Appointment of Arbitrators of Madras High Court Scheme, 1996, to appoint a Sole Arbitrator to resolve the disputes between the petitioner and the respondent in terms of Clause 18 of the Partnership Deed dated 02.12.2013.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Giridharan For Respondent : Mr.Suresh Kumar for M/s.K.M.Vijayan Associates.

* * * * *

O R D E R

Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned counsel, has entered appearance for the respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Learned counsel for the parties state that in terms of arbitration clause 18 in the Partnership Deed dated 02.12.2013, the parties have agreed to the sole arbitration of Mr.Yashod Vardhan, Senior Advocate, with the arbitration being held under the aegis of the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre.

3.Thus, by consent, I appoint Mr.R.Yashod Vardhan, Senior Advocate, residing at No.9, 7th Main Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai 600 028, Ph: 9841075397, as the Sole Arbitrator to enter upon the reference and adjudicate the disputes inter se the parties under the aegis of the Madras High Court Arbitration Centre and the parties will be governed by the Rules of the Centre.

4.The original petition is, accordingly, allowed, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

sd/.S.K.K.,CJ.

08.01.2016 //Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the day of 2016.

S.s/06.04.2016 COURT OFFICER From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/