← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/8916/2026dismissed

Akash.J v. The State Rep.By Inspector Of Police,

2026-04-09Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-04-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN 1.Akash.J 2.Gokul 3.Saranraj ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep.By Inspector of Police, Neelangarai Police Station, Chennai District.

Crime No.93 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime No.93 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of police, Neelangarai Police Station, Chennai District and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s):

No Appearance For Respondent(s):

Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest by the respondent police.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. However, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that this is the second application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners and that there has been no change in circumstances since the dismissal of the earlier petition.

3. On a perusal of the records, it is observed that the petitioners had previously moved an application for anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P. No. 6670 of 2026, which was considered on merits and dismissed by this Court on 16.03.2026.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the present petition has been filed within a very short span of time from the date of dismissal of the first application, this Court finds no fresh grounds or change in circumstances to entertain this second petition. It is a settled position of law that a successive bail application is maintainable only if there is a substantial change in the fact situation or a shift in the legal position, neither of which is present in the instant case.

5. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief sought by the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Jeni To 1.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sholinganallur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Neelangarai Police Station, Chennai District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

Jeni 09-04-2026