N.Kappini Gowder v. Susheela

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 02.12.2016 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice R.SUBRAMANIAN A.S.No.1139 of 2004 1.N.Kappini Gowder 2.Latha 3.Prema 4.Kamala 5.Anusuya 6.Manjula 7.Ravi ... Appellants/Plaintiff Vs.

1.Susheela 2.Latha 3.Jothi 4.Kalpana 5.Minor Giri (5th respondent minor rep. By his natural guardian and mother Susheela, the first respondent) 6.Arassamma @ Thangamma 7.Pappathi 8.Dr.M.B.Nanjappa 9.Dr.N.Ravindaranath 10.R.Bharathi 11.N.Bharathi 12.Selvi Thajasani 13.Selvi Sharmila ... Respondents/Defendants This Appeal has been filed against the Judgment and decree dated 11.06.2004 made in O.S.No.161 of 1988 on the file of the District Judge, Nilgiries at Uthagamandalam.

For Appellants : Mr.B.Ramamoorthy For respondents : No appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J U D G M E N T

Mr.B.Ramamoorthy, learned counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that he has got reliable instruction that the first appellant is no more and his legal representatives had taken the case bundle from him. It is also represented that one of the sons of the first appellant is an advocate who is practicing in Bangalore. In spite of sending registered letters, the learned counsel is unable to get proper instruction. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Judge, Nilgiris at Uthagamandalam.

2.The Section Officer VR Section High Court Madras A.S.No.1139 of 2004 rk(co) aa29/12/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/