← Library
Madras High CourtCMP/10005/2025allowed

J. Prabavati (Died) 1. J. Ragunath v. Nirmala Rani

2025-06-17Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 17.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL CMP.Nos.10005, 10011 & 10015 of 2025 in A.S.No.311 of 2017 J. Prabavathi (died)

1. J.Ragunath ... Petitioner / 1st Appellant in all CMPs Vs.

1. Nirmala Rani ... Respondent / first Respondent in all CMPs

(2) J.Balavenkatraman (Died)

2. Sri Valli

3. Bala Sanjana Lakshmi

4. Bala Lithish Kumar ... Proposed respondents 2 to 4/ Legal Heirs of J.Balavenkatraman in all CMPs PRAYER IN CMP.No.10005 of 2025 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 1374 days in filing the set aside abatement petition in the Appeal Suit A.s.No.311 of 2017.

PRAYER IN CMP.No.10011 of 2025 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of CPC, praying to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of appeal against second respondent in A.S.No.311 of 2017.

Page No.1 of 4

PRAYER IN CMP.No.10015 of 2025 : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order 22 Rule 4 of CPC, praying to implead the proposed respondents as respondents and array them as respondents 2 to 4 in the pending Appeal Suit against the deeased respondent in A.S.No.311 of 2017.

For Petitioners :

Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan in all CMPs For Respondents :

Mr.P.Saravana Sowmiyan for R1 in all CMPs COMMON ORDER CMP.No.10005 of 2025 has been filed to condone the delay of 1374 days in filing the set aside abatement petition in the Appeal Suit A.s.No.311 of 2017.

2. CMP.No.10011 of 2025 has been filed to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of appeal against second respondent in A.S.No.311 of 2017.

3. CMP.No.10015 of 2025 has been filed to implead the proposed respondents as respondents and array them as respondents 2 to 4 in the pending Appeal Suit against the deeased respondent in A.S.No.311 of 2017.

Page No.2 of 4

4. Heard Mr.B.Nedunchezhiyan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.P.Saravana Sowmiyan, learned counsel for the first respondent.

5. On being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions and considering the submissions made on either side, these petitions stand allowed.

17.06.2025 av Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the appeal papers.

Page No.3 of 4

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

av CMP.Nos.10005, 10011 & 10015 of 2025 in A.S.No.311 of 2017 CMA NOS.423 AND 828 OF 2021 17 / 06 / 2025 (1/2) Page No.4 of 4