D.Alamelu v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.05.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No. 9785 of 2023 D. Alamelu

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Superintendent of police Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District.

3. The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District.

4. The Sub-Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District.

5. E. Prabu

6. E. Rajesh ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent to direct

the first and second respondents to give suitable instructions to the office of the 3rd respondent to provide police protection for the purpose as stated in the representation/complaint dated 12.11.2022 and pass orders. For Petitioner : M/s. S. Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S. Santhosh Govt. Advocate( Crl Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to direct the first and second respondents to give suitable instructions to the office of the 3rd respondent to provide police protection for the purpose as stated in the representation/complaint dated 12.11.2022.

2. The case of the petitioner is that he is the absolute owner of the property situated at No.74 Nangapallam Village Survey No.8, measuring 0.09 1⁄2 cents out of Acre 0.22 cents Gummidipoondi Taluk. While so, the private respondents are creating problem with regard to the title of the subject property and attacked the petitioner and her husband. In this regard, the petitioner has given a representation on 12.11.2022 to the first and second respondents to provide police protection. Since, the said representation has not been considered till date, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the private respondents herein have no right over the subject property.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submitted that petitioner's representation will be considered on merits and in accordance with law.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances, this Court directs the official respondents to issue notice to the petitioner and the private respondents and aggrieved parties if any and conduct enquiry and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

04.05.2023 Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order smn

To

1. The Superintendent of police Office of the Superintendent of Police, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District.

3. The Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District.

4. The Sub-Inspector of Police, SIPCOT Police Station, Gummidipoondi, Tiruvallur District.

5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

smn Crl.O.P.No.9785 of 2023 04.05.2023