Axis Bank Ltd v. Chithra M

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.Appln. No.569 of 2025 M/s.AXIS Bank Ltd.

.. Applicant vs M.Chithra .. Respondent

ORDER

Till date, the Advocate Commissioner has not re-possessed the vehicle. The learned Advocate Commissioner submits that the vehicle is not located. Sufficient time has been granted for executing the warrant of commission. 2.No useful purpose will be served if this application is allowed to be kept pending that too when the vehicle is not located till date. 3.Accordingly, this application is closed by granting liberty for the applicant to file a fresh application seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner by this Court.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

ABDUL QUDDHOSE,J.

vga 4.While considering the fresh application to be filed by the applicant in the near future, this Court will consider retaining the very same Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court in this application as the applicant has already paid the Advocate Commissioner's initial remuneration. 09.07.2025 vga Arb.Appln. No.569 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis