← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22348/2015dismissed as infructuous

C.Loganathan v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2015-09-02Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Sasidharan,Honourable Mr Justice Satish K. Agnihotri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 2/9/2015 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P. No.22348 of 2015 C. Loganathan ...

Petitioner Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer Dharmapuri Dharmapuri District.

...

Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of rejection passed in proceedings in Na.Ka.6245/2013/A4 dated 10/7/2015 on the file of the respondent, quash the same and direct the respondent to issue community certificate to the petitioner's children viz., 1. L.Gowsalya and 2. L.Logeshwaran that they belong to Kurumans (ST) Community based upon the community certificate already issued to the close relatives of the petitioner.

For petitioner : Mr.V.Elangovan For respondent : Mrs.A.Srijayanthi, Spl.G.P.

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI,J.,) With the consent of the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2. This writ petition has been filed praying to quash the order dated 10th July, 2015 passed in Na.Ka.6245/2013/A4 by the respondent and direct the respondent to issue community certificate to the petitioner's children viz., 1. L.Gowsalya and 2. L.Logeshwaran that they belong to Kurumans (ST) Community based upon the community certificate already issued to the close relatives of the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. It is stated by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent that the impugned order dated 10th July, 2015 passed by the then Revenue Divisional Officer, Harur, has been recalled and a detailed order dated 28th August, 2015, adverting to all certificates after conducting proper enquiry, has been passed during pendency of this petition. Thus, nothing survives for adjudication.

4. We are not expressing any opinion on the correctness and validity of the said order in this petition. As such, we close this writ petition as having become infructuous. The petitioner is at liberty to question the legality and validity of the said order, if so advised. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar mvs/vvk To The Revenue Divisional Officer Dharmapuri Dharmapuri District.

W.P. No.22348 of 2015 rsi(co) pmk.23.9.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/