Madras High CourtCRL A/449/2013dismissed as abated

Gnanam Tex v. Infomark Marketing Pvt Ltd

2024-07-12Honourable Mrs Justice R. Hemalatha4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.07.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA Gnanam Tex, Rep. by its Proprietor, Mr.K.Gnana Sekaran, 18, R.R.Fairlands, Kondalampatty Bye Pass, Salem - 636 010.

... Appellant/Complainant Vs.

1. Infomark Marketing Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director V.K.Menon, having their office at Plot No.243, 243A, 3rd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bangalore - 560 058, India.

2. V.K.Menon ... Respondent/Accused Prayer : Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of Criminal Procedure Code, against the Judgment and orders, dated 20.12.2011 passed in S.T.C.No.516/2009 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Salem. For Appellant : Mr.P.Saravanasowmiyan For Respondents : Mrs.D.Sathya for Mrs.Zeenath Begum

JUDGMENT

Challenging the order of acquittal passed in S.T.C.No.516/2009, dated 20.12.2011 by the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Salem, the present Criminal Appeal is filed by the revision petitioner/complainant.

2. Mr.P.Saravanasowmiyan, learned counsel for the appellant contended that the 2nd Respondent / 2nd accused is no more and that the 1st Respondent is a company which is represented by the 2nd respondent. He further contended that there is no one to represent the first accused company and therefore he does not want to pursue the matter. He also made an endorsement in this regard.

3. In view of the submissions and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed. 12.07.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order vum To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.III, Salem.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court, Chennai.

R.HEMALATHA, J.

vum

12.07.2024