Madras High CourtWP/9230/2012dismissed for nonprosecution

A.K.Natarajan, v. The Tahsildar,

2017-10-13Honourable Mr Justice V. Parthiban2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.10.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN W.P.No.9230 of 2012 A.K.Natarajan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Tashildar, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kanchipuram District.

2. Mr.B.Harikrishnan

3. Mr.B.Balasundaram

4. M/s.Hallmark Golden County Ltd., rep. by Mr.Anand Jain, Suite A, No.43(Old No.62/2), United Plaza, Usman Road, Chennai-600 017.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation dated 14.12.2011 within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.S.Selvam, Government Advocate for R1 RR2 & RR3 : Disd. Vide Court order dated 04.02.2014

ORDER

When the matter was called on 10.10.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption ''for dismissal'' on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

13.10.2017. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

The Writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dn To The Tashildar, Chengalpattu Taluk, Kanchipuram District.

+1cc to Mr.R.Parthasarathy, Advocate, S.R.No.74014 W.P.No.9230 of 2012 BR(CO) CA(22/11/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/