Madras High CourtWP/13390/2021disposed of

E.Gunasekaran v. The District Revenue Officer

2021-06-28Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.No.13390 of 2021 E.Gunasekaran S/o. Easwaran ... Petitioner Vs.

The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.02.2021 for rectifying the mistake occurred during the UDR scheme in respect of his lands measuring 0.86 acres in S.F. No.50/7 situate at Chinnakuthipala Village, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District in accordance with law and within a stipulated period.

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Respondent :

Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Government Advocate

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction directing the respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09.02.2021 for rectifying the mistake occurred during the UDR Scheme in respect of his land in Survey No.50/7, situated at Chinnakuthipala Village, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the petitioner is the owner of property comprised in in Survey No.50/7, situated at Chinnakuthipala Village, Soolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Earlier, the revenue records stand in the name of petitioner. However, during the UDR Scheme, the land has https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

been wrongly classified as natham land. In the said circumstances, the petitioner has made a representation to the respondent on 09.02.2021 to rectify the mistake. But, so far, his representation was not considered and no order has been passed on it. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner.

3. Considering the limited prayer sought in the Writ Petition, without going into the merits of the case, the respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation and to pass suitable orders on merits in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rpp To The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

+1cc to the Government Pleader sr.30263 +1cc to M/s.K.Govi Ganesan, Advocate Sr.30025 W.P.No.13390 of 2021 sky[co] srg 19/07/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/