S.Praveen v. The State Represented By

Crl.M.P.No.8050 of 2021 in M.SUNDAR.J., Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in the previous listing on 27.08.2021.

2. Today, Mr.R.Rajadurai, learned counsel for petitioner (Accused No.3) is before this Virtual Court and Mr.V.J.Priyadarsana, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) from the State Public Prosecutor's office is personally present before this Court.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner expresses regret for not representing the matter in the previous listing.

4. An order of anticipatory bail was granted by me vide order dated 07.06.2021 and in the captioned petition, an amendment is sought with regard to the Magistrate to whose satisfaction the bond / sureties had to be executed.

5. Learned State counsel very fairly submits that owing to the nature of the prayer, he has no serious objection and it is the discretion of this Court 1/3

6. In the light of the trajectory thus far, considering the innocuous nature of the prayer, captioned petition is ordered as prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. To be noted, in and by original order dated 07.06.2021, the bonds / sureties had to be furnished on or before 05.07.2021 or within a fortnight from the date of resumption of acceptance of sureties by the jurisdictional Court. This Court is informed that the time frames have elapsed. Therefore, time frames are extended and the petitioner shall comply with conditions adumbrated in paragraph 4(a) of the order dated 07.06.2021 within a fortnight from today, i.e, on or before 27.09.2021. 13.09.2021 gpa/tri 2/3

M.SUNDAR.J., gpa/tri 13.09.2021 3/3