M.A. Syed Mohamed v. V.M.S. Hajara Beevi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Sixth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN CMP NoS.7682 and 7683 of 2016 IN AS.347/2016 M.A. SYED MOHAMED [PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS] S/O. A.P.M.S. MOHAMMED ALI MARAKAYAR, 17, AUDIAPPA STREET, PURASAWALKAM, CHENNAI - 600 084.

Vs 1 V.M.S. HAJARA BEEVI [RESPONDENTS IN BOTH THE PETITIONS] 57, LABBAI STREET, PUDUPET, CHENNAI - 600 002.

K.SRINIVASA RAJ (DIED) 2 MOHAMMED ISMAIL 3 MINOR RAASHID SULTAN 4 MINOR M. SHAMIMA ADERA 5 MINOR SUHAIL AHMAD RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 ARE MINORS AND REP BY THEIR MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SHAKILA BANU.

6 MR. R. NAGARAJAN 7 MRS. MANOHARI 8 MR. MANOJ 9 MINOR RAJ REB BY MOTHER MANOHARI

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass as interim injunction restraining the Respondents and their guardians or any persons or persons authorized or empowered by them on their behalf from encumbering, alienating or creating charge over the petition schedule mentioned property by way of sale, mortgage, charge, lien or lease any other conveyance in of any manner with respect to the suit schedule property, [in CMP.7682 of 2016] pending in AS.347 of 2016 [ii] To pass an interim injunction restraining the Respondents, their men, agents, servants or any one claiming through them from interfering with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petition schedule property in OS. 424/06, [in CMP.7683 of 2016] pending in AS.347 of 2016 respectively.

SCHEDULE OF THE PROPERTY XEROX COPY ATTACHED Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing these petitions and these affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.I.ABDUL BASITH, Advocate for the petitioner in both the petitions the court made the following order:- (Order of the Court was made by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) The interim order is in operation for more than 2 1/2 years. The petitioner has also taken out due publication by way of substituted service.

2.In such view of the matter, interim order already granted is made absolute and these petitions are ordered. -sd/- 26/02/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHENGALPATTU C.C. to M/S.I.ABDUL BASITH Advocate Order in CMP NoS.7682 and 7683 of 2016 in AS.347/2016 Date :26/02/2019 From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format RRI 06/03/2019