V.Sekar And 2 Others v. Nil

A NO. 1959 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24-04-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A NO. 1959 of 2025 in O.P.No.546 of 2023 V.Sekar and 2 others No.7, Parthasarathi Swamy Street, Triplicane, Chennai - 600 005. and 2 Others Applicant(s) Vs nil nil Respondent(s) For Applicant(s):

M/s.R.Ragavendran For Respondent(s):

ORDER

The present application has been filed to permit the 1st and 2nd petitioners to execute the agreement for sale and sale deed with prospective buyer/s for the sale of schedule property.

2. Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that by order dated 06.03.2024, this Court had issued Letters of Administration in favour of the petitioners, and the grant was issued by the Registry on

14.06.2024. The petitioners have approached this Court in Application No.714 of 2025, wherein the third petitioner had sought permission to execute a settlement deed in favour of the first and second petitioners. This Court, by its order dated 19.02.2025, allowed the said application.

3. Subsequently, on 14.03.2025, the third petitioner had executed a settlement deed in favour of the first and second petitioners through a registered document bearing Document No. 353 of 2025 on the file of the SRO, Triplicane. As such, the first and second petitioners are now in absolute possession and enjoyment of the property.

4. Since petitioners 1 and 2 find it difficult to manage the property, they have mutually agreed to sell the same for beneficial enjoyment. Hence, they seek permission of this Court to execute an agreement of sale and sale deed with the prospective buyer in respect of the suit-scheduled property.

5. Having considered the claim of the applicants and on the strength of various documents placed before the Court, this Court, by order dated 06.03.2024, found that the petitioners had proved their claim and had been granted Letters of Administration accordingly. Thereafter, the third petitioner

executed a settlement deed in favour of the first and second petitioners, who have now jointly decided to dispose the property for better enjoyment of the rights derived therefrom.

6. I find no impediment in allowing the application as prayed for, as their claim to the property has already been proved and accepted by this Court.

7. In fine, the application in A.No.714 of 2025 in O.P.No.546 of 2023 is ordered as prayed for. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 24-04-2025 kak To

1. nil nil