Madras High CourtCRP/1685/2025disposed of

S.V.Ravikumar v. K. Santhanalakshmi

2025-04-25Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-06-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR CRP No.1685 of 2025 and CMP No. 9762 of 2025 S.V.Ravikumar Petitioner -VersusK. Santhanalakshmi Respondent Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the order dated 27.03.2025 made in E.P.No.56 of 2024 in RLTOP.No. 8 of 2023 on the file of Principal District Munsif-cum-Rent Court, Poonamallee., Tiruvallur District.

For Petitioner :

Mr.B.Govindaprabu for M/s.Shri Varshini For Respondent :

Mr.H.Mohammed Farook

ORDER

This court, by order dated 25.04.2025, disposed of the abovementioned civil revision petition, recording the undertaking affidavit dated 23.04.2025 filed by the revision petitioner/tenant that he would vacate and hand over the vacant possession of the subject premises to the respondent/landlord by 23.04.2025.

2. The operative portions of the order passed by this court on 25.04.2025 read as follows:

"5. Recording the undertaking affidavit dated 23.04.2025 filed by the petitioner, the revision stands disposed directing the petitioner to vacate and handover the premises on or before 06.06.2025, failing which, the petitioner will be liable for contempt. Till such time, the EP proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. 6. Post the matter on 09.06.2025 for reporting compliance. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of and the undertaking affidavit dated 23.04.2025 shall form part of the Court records."

3. Accordingly, the above said civil revision petition is listed today for

reporting compliance.

4. Mr.R.Karunanidhi, the husband of the respondent/landlord is present. Key of the subject premises has been handed over to him by the learned counsel Mr.B.Govindaprabhu for the petitioner/tenant in the presence of the learned counsel Mr.H.Mohammed Farook for the respondent/landlord.

5. The husband of the respondent/landlord stated that he himself visited the subject premises and found the subject premises to be fully vacated by the revision petitioner/tenant. The said statement is recorded.

6. In the light of the above, compliance is recorded and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter.

09..06..2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

To 1.The Principal District Munsif (Rent Court) Poonamallee, Tiruvallur District.

N.SATHISH KUMAR J.

09..06..2025