Lakshmi Chandrasekaran v. Balaji Jayaraman

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Lakshmi Chandrasekaran

...Petitioner

Vs.

Balaji Jayaraman ... Respondent Prayer: Original Petition filed under Section 232, 255 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act read with order XXV Rule 5 of O.S.Rules, praying to grant letters of Administration in respect of the Will dated 04.05.2006 annexed to the petition as niece and legatee under the Will of the deceased Lakshinarayanan having effect limited to the State of Tamilnadu Limited in the assets mentioned in the affidavit. For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Annagandhi For Respondent : Mr.R.Gunasekaran

ORDER

This Original Petition had been listed under the caption ''For Being Mentioned'' at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

1/3

2. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has been represented in this Original Petition only through a Power Agent and a vakalat has also been filed by the Power Agent and necessary powers are given to the Power Agent, who will also be entitled to execute a security bond as ordered by this Court. Since the order directs the respondent to execute the security bond as required, the Registry is not accepting the security bond executed by the Power Agent. Hence, he seeks clarification in this regard.

3. Considering the fact that the respondent is being represented by Power Agent in this Original Petition, the Power Agent of the respondent shall execute the security bond on behalf of the respondent. 07.10.2025 Sn K.KUMARESH BABU , J.

Sn 2/3

07.10.2025 3/3