G.Manogaran v. Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.11.2015 CORAM :

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P. No.22758 of 2015 G.Manogaran .. Petitioner -vsTamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board (USRB), Rep. By its Member Secretary, Chennai.

.. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the impugned result of non-selection of the petitioner - Registration No.703915 dated 21.07.2015 ref. Nil issued by the respondent to the post of Sub-Inspector of Police Taluk (Men and Women) - 2015 and quash the same, consequently directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to participate in the next stages of physical test and interview to be held on 03.08.2015 and its subsequent dates for the said post so as to enable the petitioner to appoint the petitioner as Sub Inspector of Police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.L.Chandrakumar for M/s.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondents :

Mr.P.H.Aravindh Pandian, Addl. Adv. General, assisted by Mr.S.T.S.Murthi, Govt. Pleader * * * * *

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner seeks recruitment to the post of SubInspector in pursuance to the notification issued on 08.02.2015 under Sports category. The certificates filed by the petitioner show his participation in the event of 'Cross Country'. There https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

is another certificate mentioning his participation in an athletic meet.

2.In so far as the Cross Country is concerned, we have already opined in H.Sathish Kumar and others vs. The Chairman / Director General of Police, Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, Chennai and another, in W.P.No.26090 to 26092 of 2015 vide order dated 15.10.2015 that it will not form a part of the events for which benefits of sports category has to be given in view of Clause 7 (iii), which has specified the events. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner also seeks to contend that the petitioner ran a 800 metre race in the athletic meet. However, there is no certificate to this effect specifying that the petitioner had run that event. It is only mentioning his participation in the athletic meet held during 2009-2010. 4.In view of the aforesaid reason, we are not inclined to entertain the petition.

5.Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar sra To The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board (USRB), Chennai.

+1 cc to Government Pleader sr.61168 +1 cc to Mr.M.R.Jothimanian Advocate sr.61103 W.P.No.22758 of 2015 aa23/11/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/