The Commissioner Of Central v. M/S Audco India Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.04.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR C.M.A.Nos.1938 and 1943 of 2009 The Commissioner of Central Excise Chennai IV Commissionerate M.H.U.Complex, No.692, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

..1st Appellant in the above C.M.As Vs.

1. M/s.Audco India Limited, No.976, Mount Poonamallee Road, Manapakkam, Chennai-600 089.

..1st Respondent in C.M.A.No.1938 of 2009

1. M/s.Sundaram Fasteners (Autolec Division), Plant III, 47/2, Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi, Chennai - 600 077.

..1st Respondent in CMA.NO.1943/09

2. Customs, Excise & Service Tas Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Shastri Bhavan, Annexe, First Floor, No.26, Haddows Road, Chennai-6.(R2- given up) ..2nd Respondent in appeals of 2009 Appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order dated 01.01.2009 passed in Final Order No.22 and 27/2009, by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Chennai. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Appellant : Mr.A.P.Srinivas C O M M O N J U D G M E N T (Judgment of the Court was delivered by RAJIV SHAKDHER,J.) 1.Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellant says that the tax effect is less than the monetary limit, as fixed by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, vide Circular dated 17.12.2015, and amended by Circular dated 30.12.2016. Learned counsel says he has instructions to withdraw the appeals. 2.The appeals are accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sl To 1.The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench at Chennai.

+ 1 cc to Mr.A.P. Srinivas, Advocate SR.25857 C.M.A.Nos.1938 and 1943 of 2009 SV(CO) Eu 4.5.17 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/